If a CO & CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?

Lip service by Obama means nothing.



We can exhust carbon or steam. Cheaper electric power can help eliminate NOX emmisions from gas fired fuels.

Obama don't you want to reduce carbon emmisions?If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?He's not a problem solver, what he truly is, is a trouble maker.If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?
Obama is lying; are you even in the least bit surprised.If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?Because the SHAM of global warming is about control and money, it was NEVER about CO2 reductions.If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?
Nuclear Waste will come back and cost our next generations.



Coal is here now and creates a lot of jobs from mining to mining Equipment I am sure the picture is way to big for you to see with your blinders on.If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?The global warming promoters tip their hand with the solutions they offer which are not solutions at all.



You want to stop using fossil fuels...fine.



Start promoting permaculture farming and localized economies if you are genuine. Cap and trade is a scam.If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?
You realize, of course, that everything with a spinal cord on planet Earth exhales CO2, right?

Bet there will soon be a breathing tax.

And nukes are out of the question. Too clean, too easy, and it's proven technology. No Lib in the world would support anything that is clean, easy, or proven. Societal experimentation is their game.

That's how Barry got elected in the first place....If a CO %26amp; CO2 are really an environmental problem, why are they not fast tracking Nuclear Power?
No one likes dealing with nuclear waste, it's expensive to dispose of.

I've got nothing against nuclear power but I'd rather slowly take the slack off coal with more renewable energy over 10 or 20 years, which is reasonable I think, global warming happens so slowly, we've got plenty of time to take care of the problem.